Up WHAT IS REALITY? (Response to the conference "Secret Space Program - Breakaway Civilization" in the Zonnehuis in Amsterdam on April 3, 2011) Kees Deckers April 2011 What is reality? My entire life already I try to figure this out. To that end I went to the Zonneplein (Sun Square) in Amsterdam on April 3. Here  stands the Zonnehuis (Sun House). On this Sunday, in this monumental building the conference "Secret Space Program - Breakaway  Civilization" took place.  Internet reference (04-04-11): http://www.secretspaceprogram.com/ A total of 5 speakers told their story during a programme, that lasted from 09:30 hours till 21:30 hours. Four of the five speakers for years  already gain their spurs with research outside of the “main stream”, according to the Star Trek-rule: “To boldly go where no one has gone  before”. So with research, which goes beyond the boundaries of that “main stream”. Their research concerns contacts between extra-  terrestrials and Earthlings, black budgets, the repression of already long existing knowledge, technology and free energy, and secret  organisations and dubious, small groups of people, such as the Nazis, who think themselves superior to the rest of humankind and use the  last only to finance and further their own agenda and goals. To what extent are these speakers right? Is this really a part of our current  reality and possibly even from the beginning of our existence?  What is reality? 80% of the narrowed scientists will dismiss all that was put forward during the conference directly to the realm of fiction. But if  humans are capable of inventing such a realm of fiction, does it not at the same time become a part of our reality?  120% of the sceptics and debunkers will start jumping up and down from anger and will start shouting: “It is not so! It is not so!” After all,  they know what reality is. For, together with those 80% narrowed scientists, they are the ones who determine and limit what reality is. What  a superiority, and above all: What a fantasy!  Why should a tiny fraction of humanity be able and be allowed to define and limit what reality is, while the rest of us would not be able to  and should not be allowed to do this? The fact that there are many people, who have very different experiences and therefore also have quite  a different outlook on reality, then the one determined and nailed down by the narrowed scientists and their body guards, the sceptics and  the debunkers, already proves that reality goes far beyond the ideas, rules and laws of the last. Are it perhaps these narrowed scientists and  their body guards, who form a beautifully suitable means for these other groups of people to keep themselves, their agenda and their goals a  secret? What is reality? During the by the Ground Crew in Europe (http://web.me.com/groundcrews2/Ground_Crews/About_Us.html), excellently  organised conference “Secret Space Program - Breakaway Civilization” Peter Levenda (http://www.sinisterforces.info/) started with his  research into the eagerness with which some Americans after World War II brought Nazi scientists like Walter Dornberger and Wernher von  Braun to their country to take advantage of their knowledge and skills. Operation Paperclip, the development of the American space  programme from Nazis to N.A.S.A., the origin of the secret space programme, the motive for the murder on J.F. Kennedy and the Cold War,  have been researched, reviewed and explained by Peter Levenda from a somewhat different standpoint and viewpoint than that of the  permitted and established reality. Let’s call the last the “mainstream” reality. The reality of the main stream.  Peter Levenda’s question is, did the Nazis, brought to America, from that point onwards really work for the American people, or did they,  possibly from the start, work and still are working for another, secret agenda for their own benefit? His search to find an answer to this  question leads to intriguing, other possibilities. Possibilities, which give another view of reality with respect to many happenings in human  society. How do you keep things secret? By discrediting the researchers. By making them seem like estranged, unreliable and disturbed people. How  do you do this? To give just one example, the people, who, at the background, are involved in the murder of John F. Kennedy are U.F.O.-  personalities, bishops of a strange church, researchers of the paranormal, anti-communists and employees of N.A.S.A. The strange church,  according to Peter Levenda, only has bishops, there are no priests. What is the reason that many of the persons, who possibly play a role in  the murder of Kennedy, are a member of this church? The woven web of strangeness and normality will result in any researcher making such  statements being laughed at squarely in the face by the followers of the mainstream reality. Is it a brilliant way to obscure and hide the facts,  or as the catch-phrase of one of the episodes of the X-Files, titled “Teliko”, states: Deceive, inveigle, obfuscate? Or were these ways to bring  the money and the other means together at the right place and at the right time? Or maybe even both?  What is reality? Refreshing to me, was the start of Timothy Good’s (http://www.timothygood.co.uk/index.htm) contribution to the programme.  Finally someone, who states that the U.F.O.-era does not start with the Roswell-incident in America. Extraterrestrials have always visited  Earth, even long before the rise of humans. He mentions for instance Sweden, that in the last century, around 1930 already was visited by  unidentified flying objects. And Italy, where apparently a U.F.O. landed near Milan in 1933. And where Mussolini, a fervent fan of planes,  subsequently brought together a group of scientists, who, under the leadership of Nobel prize winner and inventor of the wireless telegraph  Marconi, established the first secret organisation into the research of the U.F.O.-phenomenon. Mussolini explicitely forbade them to leak  information to the press. Then there were the Foo-fighters, which were observed almost universally during World War II. And a kilometres  wide U.F.O. above France, observed by a complete squadron of aviators.  An avalanche of other observed phenomena and names of people follows in the story of Timothy Good, which taken all together make a  larger and different reality, in which extraterrestrials have long been playing a role, very plausible. Like for instance the landing of a flying  saucer in Bexleyheath, a suburb of London in 1955 (http://www.ufocasebook.com/bexley1955.html).  Internet reference (04-04-11): http://www.ufocasebook.com/bexley1955.html The statements of astronauts Gordon Cooper, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin with regard to U.F.O.’s. George Adamski. The mass contact of  the Italian association Amicizia with extraterrestrials. The English hacker Gary McKinnon. The former Canadian Minister of Defense Paul  Hellyer. Ben Rich, director of Lockheed’s Skunk Works from 1975 to 1991, who confessed on his deathbed amongst other things: “We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects, and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to  benefit humanity. Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do.”  “We now have the technology to take ET home. No, it won’t take someone’s lifetime to do it.  Internet reference (04-04-11):  http://battleofearth.wordpress.com/2010/09/09/extraterrestrial-ufo-are-real-ben-rich-lockheed-ceo-admitted-in-his-deathbed-confession/  Many of the examples show, how much certain people keep secret from the public, from the rest of humankind. That is why Timothy Good  ended his contribution with the following remark: We are a genetic by-product of extraterrestrials, who already long before us were on our  planet. Other extraterrestrials still visit us all the time. Some with evil intentions. But I am still more afraid of human beings!  What is reality? Richard Hoagland did not have enough time to tell his tale. Nevertheless his picture of the happenings in America on September  11 2001, which he gives a pivotal place and a pivotal moment in his idea of the reality of the human world events, was crystal clear. Although  I get very tired of invariably looking at human reality, based mostly and almost exclusively on American events, his story was very intriguing.  What really happened? Using an impressive series of photos, amongst which photos from Dr. Judy Wood’s website and book, titled: “Where  Did the Towers Go? The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11” (http://drjudywood.com/towers/index.html), Richard  Hoagland showed, in a fascinating tale, what strange things took place on this day in and even up to far around the twin towers. Steel  columns and slabs were bent in baffling ways into the strangest and even seemingly impossible shapes and “appeared” to have melted. Steel  became so thin that you literally can look through it. Cars were damaged bizarrely, even up to more than a kilometre away from the towers.  Cars were completely burned-out, while nothing of the enormous amount of paper strewn closely around them was burned. Fire did not seem  to be fire. Pulverisation took place of a lot of what was inside the two towers and of a lot of the towers themselves, almost to the point of de-  materialisation.   The front half of car 2723 is toasted, but check out the new wax job on the back. Notice the missing front door handle and the untouched back door handle. Internet reference (04-04-11): http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam5.html Next page